An Unbiased View of collusion by contractors case laws in pakistan
An Unbiased View of collusion by contractors case laws in pakistan
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, advertising a more informed and just society.
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive piece of legislation that defines various criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for those found guilty.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a effectively-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The issue Here's that an accused could say that they meant to injure the target, but they did not here intend to kill them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.
Typically, only an appeal accepted because of the court of very last resort will resolve these kinds of differences and, For a lot of reasons, these kinds of appeals are sometimes not granted.
When several websites offer free case law, not all are equally reliable. It’s important To guage the credibility in the source before counting on the information.
In order to prove murder, there must be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well founded now that the provision for proforma promotion is not really alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service framework however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it really is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority could if happy that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service on the Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of this sort of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
a hundred and fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.